Q22Layer 3 Technologies
Refer to the exhibit. The network administrator must configure Cape Town to reach Dubai through Tokyo according to the speeds supplied by the service provider. Cape Town is instead reaching Dubai directly and therefore does not meet the requirement. Which configuration resolves the issue?
← → navigate · a answer
Community votes
Discussion · 9
C 9
Selected Answer: C
to change the cost, we must change the bandwith on every path
3
If B is correct, why not C?
3
we need to change bandwidth on both sides - it uses the lowest bandwidth. And variance will cause traffic balancing, which is not what we want.
3
I mean we can still do balancing by setting bandwidths, but only if feasability condition is met. Notice the words: " based on the speeds provided by the service provider". We need to change the bandwidth to match the speeds provided by the ISP
C 2
Selected Answer: C
https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/changing-interface-bandwidth-affects-eigrp-availability/td-p/2879429
C 2
Selected Answer: C
yes anwser correct is "C", all path
1
Probably because u only need to manipulate the metric of the Cape town to tokyo and then to dubai, so assume that tokyo and dubai still works with their default metrics
B 1
Selected Answer: B
The network administrator must configure Cape Town to reach Dubai via Tokyo based on the speeds provided by the service provider. It was noticed that Cape Town is reaching Dubai directly and failed to meet the requirement. Which configuration fixes the issue?
1
Bw represents the slowest link in the path. Link speed is colected from the confgured interface bandwidth.