ETExamTower
Q107IP Connectivity

Refer to the exhibit. Drag and drop the prefix lengths from the left onto the matching prefixes on the right. Not all prefix lengths are used. <DragDrop items={["255.255.255.128","255.255.255.224","255.255.255.240","255.255.255.248","255.255.255.252"]} slots={[{"answer":"255.255.255.128","id":"s1","label":"10.10.13.0"},{"answer":"255.255.255.240","id":"s2","label":"10.10.13.144"},{"answer":"255.255.255.248","id":"s3","label":"10.10.13.160"},{"answer":"255.255.255.224","id":"s4","label":"209.165.202.128"}]} explanation={"The routing table identifies the destination networks and their prefix lengths: 10.10.13.0/25, 10.10.13.144/28, and 10.10.13.160/29. Converting CIDR to dotted-decimal masks gives /25 = 255.255.255.128, /28 = 255.255.255.240, and /29 = 255.255.255.248. For 209.165.202.128, the exhibit shows the 209.165.202.0 network is subnetted with /27 prefixes, so 209.165.202.128 is a /27 network, which uses mask 255.255.255.224. A /30 mask would be 255.255.255.252, which is not used for any of the listed destination prefixes.\n\n**Learn more:** [Understand Host and Subnet Quantities - Cisco](https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/routing-information-protocol-rip/13790-8.html) · [RFC 1878: Variable Length Subnet Table For IPv4](https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1878/)"} reuse={false} />

Question exhibit
← → navigate · a answer
Discussion · 20
124
Correct order: .128 .240 .248 .224
32
I’d say the last one is .252 The reason for this is: 209.165.202.128 is reachable via 10.10.12.2 and 10.10.12.2 is part of the 10.10.12.2/30, hence 252
13
The Correct order is : .128 .240 .248 .224 : About this ..... it already stated that the 209.165.202.0/27 is subnetted into 1 subnet which is 209.165.202.128 the 5th available subnet for /27 they go as (first 0-31, second 32-63, third 64-95 , Fourth 96-127 AND the 5th 128-160 etc...)
6
Correct order: .128 .240 .248 .252
5
i see 209.165.202.128 as a subnet of (by magic number) 209.165.202.0 - 32 - 64 - 96 - 128....... /27
4
The last one is not .252 but .224
3
Agreed!
3
correct answers are: .128 .240 .248 .224
2
Agreeing with vladals here
2
i am agree with MikD4016 /27 ----->32 magic number
2
Who is taking the exam this month and passed ?
1
vero è giusto
1
I had to do a bit of research and I came up with this: In the figure, it says 209.165.202.0/27 is subnetted, 1 subnet. This means the classfull address of the original network 209.165.202.0/24 has one subnet with /27 subnet mask. This means that 209.165.202.128 will have /27 SM >>> 255.255.255.240. Also from the figure The classful address 10.0.0.0/8 of the original network is variably subnetted into 8 subnets with 4 different subnet masks (/25,/28,/29./30.) From the figure, we have 8 subnets from the original network 10.0.0.0/8 with 4 different subnet masks.
1
correct answer 255.255.255.128 (10.10.13.0/25 includes 10.10.13.0 IP address) 255.255.255.240 (10.10.13.144/28 includes 10.10.13.144 IP address) 255.255.255.248 (10.10.13.160/29 includes 10.10.13.160 IP address) 255.255.255.248 refer to my explanation above
1
Classful address 209.165.202.0/24 of the original network belongs to class C and has the following range of IP addresses (209.165.202.0-209.165.202.255) Classful address 10.0.0.0/8 of the original network belongs to class A and has the following range of IP addresses (10.0.0.0-10.255.255.255) using these IP addresses we can make subnets. The STATEMENT in the routing table that comes before the subnets: If it says "subnetted" then the subnet mask provided with the statement is the subnet mask of the subnet. If it says "variably subnetted" then the subnet mask of the subnet is different. The statement also gives the number of subnets and subnet masks being used. https://forum.networklessons.com/t/how-to-configure-rip-on-a-cisco-router/877/24?page=2
1
Correct order: .128 .240 .248 .224 is the right answer for the last one. The exhibit says that it is subnetted and incorrectly configured because the AD is 20 with the metric of "0". OSPF metric can never be "0"
1
Is this notation right ? 209.165.202.0/27 should be 209.165.202.128/27 ? 209.165.202.0/27 is subnetted, 1 subnets~ 209.165.202.128
1
B is not OSPF, is BGP; I don't know about metric=0
1
correct order is : 128 240 248 252 Because 209.165.202.0/27 means all of 209.165.202.x — but that’s only one block and 209.165.202.128 refers to 10.10.12.2, which is 255.255.255.252
1
how can the answer like that?